Dear visitor, welcome to AV-Comparatives Forum. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Sunday, December 9th 2007, 9:47pm
Quoted
webwasher is probably the king of false positives. it flags almost everything.No wonder that it scores high.
p.s.: forget the "4 detection methods" based on what virusinfo says. just because it does not show up there, it does not mean that other av's do not also have those "detection methods". they use only ~60 samples. heuristic and supsicious may be the same, without knowing the engine behind a product you can not conclude on how it works based on what a log file says. And e.g. KAV has also packer detection, but just because in the 60 samples scanned by virustotal there was no packer detection by kav, virusinfo says KAV does not have the "packer detection method".
Saturday, December 15th 2007, 5:09pm
But I think we can write this report without you admini sent a preview of the summary report 1 week ago to the vendors, in order that they can complain if something is wrong or needs a correction. i think i will release it in about 3 days.
Looking at your comparisones everyone can say who is your product of the year 
Sunday, December 16th 2007, 9:54am
But I think we can write this report without you admini sent a preview of the summary report 1 week ago to the vendors, in order that they can complain if something is wrong or needs a correction. i think i will release it in about 3 days.
Saturday, May 18th 2013, 5:05pm
Go to the top of the page
